Whats the difference between home insurance and rental insurance?
for my rental property? Is it a good idea to switch home insurance to rental insurance when a tenant is living in my rental property just in case if they smashed some holes on the wall, or some damages on the property? Where i can compare home insures?
Thanks!
You need to change or they will not pay if you have a claim. Holes are not covered, neither is most tenant damage. But, you still need fire damage, weather, etc etc.
Also, if you are going to allow animals check your policy, they are not likely to cover your property if you allow any dangerous animals.
Try this site
http://best-home-insurance-comparator-usa.blogspot.com/
Here you can get quotes from different home insurance companies in your area, its the best way to find an affordable home insurance with a reliable company.
Categories: home insurance Tags: Affordable Insurance, Blogspot, Damages, Dangerous Animals, Fire Damage, Holes, Home Insurance Companies, insurance, Quotes, Reliable Company, Rental Insurance, Rental Property, Weather
Why home insurance companies are sensitive to lapses in the insurance?
When I shop for a home insurance I am always asked if my home is currently insured or if there are lapses in my insurance policy. Some companies outright refuse to give me a quote when I tell them that I haven’t had home insurance in the last 3-4 months. I am wondering why this is important for them?! They just referred to their company policy and did not give me any meaningful reasoning. Who’s the best company for home insurance? Thank you for your answer.
http://best-home-insurance-comparator-usa.blogspot.com/
Here you can get quotes from different home insurance companies in your area, its the best way to find an affordable home insurance with a reliable company.
Insurance companies are wary of lapses in any kind of insurance policies. In your case it just happened to be home insurance.
The single most feared factor in the insurance business is not hurricanes, not bush-fires, not wars, not meteor strikes but what’s known as ‘moral hazard’. Moral hazard is, in simple terms, lack of inhibition in preferring a claim under less than above-the-board circumstances.
For example, if your camera is insured for home use only, you cannot make a claim if the insured camera suffers damage during a jungle safari. Most of us, being honest persons, would not even want to claim under such circs. However, since, as a rule it takes all kinds to make this world, there exist individuals who would make a claim as if the damage occurred at home. Such individuals are considered to be ‘moral hazards’.
Coming back to your original question, insurance companies know from empirical evidence that the incidence of moral hazard is greater – much greater – in those cases where there’s a break iin coverage. It’s likely that the insured is trying to renew the policy after a loss has occurred.
You need to provide evidence to the insurance company that you did not intend to let the policy lapse. That it lapsed, is a fortuitous happenning (please note the wording – underwriters love such language) and not a deliberate omission. ‘I do not want to be penalised for something over which I had no control’ is the line you need to take. You could strike lucky with this line.
Categories: home insurance Tags: 4 Months, Blogspot, Bush Fires, Circumstances, Company Insurance, Empirical Evidence, Home Insurance Companies, Hurricanes, Inhibition, Insurance Business, Insurance Company, Insurance Policies, Insurance Policy, Insurance Shop, Jungle Safari, Lapses, Meteor Strikes, Moral Hazard, Moral Hazards, Reliable Company